A former California State Parks boss now faces charges that cut straight to privacy, trust, and basic decency.
Quick Take
- Kevin Pearsall, a former California State Parks superintendent, was charged with secretly recording lifeguards and workers in a beach locker room.[1]
- Prosecutors say 23 men were recorded without consent, and the case involves five felony counts and multiple misdemeanors.[1]
- Authorities allege the hidden camera was found inside a USB memory stick in the men’s employee locker room.[1]
- Pearsall turned himself in, and prosecutors say the recordings stretched over about 11 months.[1]
Alleged Recording Scheme Inside a Locker Room
Orange County prosecutors say Kevin Pearsall secretly recorded naked male lifeguards and other workers inside the men’s employee locker room at Bolsa Chica State Beach Lifeguard Headquarters.[1] The Orange County District Attorney’s Office says the case began when a California State Parks officer found a USB memory stick with a hidden camera in July 2025. Prosecutors say state park officials then reviewed the contents and called the California Highway Patrol.
The charging papers say the California Highway Patrol investigation found Pearsall was responsible for placing hidden cameras in the locker room.[1] Prosecutors allege the devices recorded both audio and video and ran for 11 months, beginning in August 2024.[1] They also say 23 men were recorded without permission, which makes the case more than a simple lapse in judgment. It reads like a deliberate invasion of a private space where workers had every right to expect privacy.
Charges, Exposure, and Public Fallout
Pearsall faces five felony counts of eavesdropping, 23 misdemeanor counts of secretly filming another person, and three misdemeanor counts of unlawful dissemination of private recordings.[1] Prosecutors also say he sent images of nude or partly nude men to two other men and made sexual comments about the victims’ anatomy.[1] If convicted on all counts, he faces up to 18 years and eight months in custody.[1]
Pearsall turned himself in on a $500,000 arrest warrant and was later released on his own recognizance, according to prosecutors.[1] The story has drawn sharp attention because Pearsall was not just any employee. He was a public face of California State Parks, which makes the alleged conduct feel like a betrayal of the very people the agency was supposed to protect. That kind of trust gap is exactly what angers taxpayers and public workers alike.
Why the Case Hits a Nerve
This case touches a raw point for many Californians: a government official accused of using his position to violate worker privacy in a locked employee space.[1] Locker rooms are not public squares, and workers do not give up their rights when they clock in. A hidden camera in that setting raises serious concerns about abuse of power, weak oversight, and how long such conduct can go unnoticed inside a state agency.[16][17]
The law generally treats locker rooms as private places where surveillance is off limits.[16][17][18] Research on workplace surveillance also shows that monitoring in private spaces can increase distress and damage trust.[19] In this case, the main facts now matter most: who was recorded, when it happened, and what evidence prosecutors can prove in court. Until then, Pearsall remains accused, and the public will keep watching how California handles one of its own.
A former California State Parks superintendent in Orange County has been released on bond after being accused of secretly recording lifeguards in a men's locker room, authorities said. @abc7bianca
Prosecutors allege 59-year-old Kevin Pearsall placed a hidden camera in the men's… pic.twitter.com/kDLKwrkZVA
— ABC7 Eyewitness News (@ABC7) June 25, 2026
Sources:
[1] Web – Former California State Parks official charged with videotaping naked …
[16] Web – At least 23 lifeguards secretly recorded in OC locker room, ex-State …
[17] Web – Can You Install Hidden Cameras in the Office? – SafeHome.org
[18] Web – Legality of Cameras in the Workplace Explained: Legal vs. Illegal Uses
[19] Web – Is It Legal to Have Security Cameras in the Workplace? – Rhombus



