Los Angeles city leaders are still pushing to remove police from traffic enforcement duties despite rising street deaths and dangerous ‘burnout’ incidents plaguing the city’s roads.
Story Highlights
- LA proposal to strip police of traffic enforcement powers remains active despite bureaucratic delays
- City continues planning despite documented road safety crisis and street racing problems
- Policy threatens public safety while handcuffing law enforcement capabilities
- Another example of progressive leaders prioritizing ideology over citizen protection
Dangerous Policy Survives Despite Street Crisis
Los Angeles city officials continue advancing a reckless proposal to strip police officers of traffic enforcement responsibilities, even as the city grapples with increasing traffic fatalities and rampant street racing. The initiative remains buried in city bureaucracy but has not been abandoned by progressive leaders who seem determined to implement it regardless of public safety consequences. This represents another dangerous attempt to defund and limit police capabilities when strong enforcement is desperately needed.
Timing Reveals Misplaced Priorities
The persistence of this proposal demonstrates the disconnect between Los Angeles leadership and street-level reality. While residents deal with dangerous ‘burnout’ incidents and rising traffic deaths, city officials remain focused on restricting police authority rather than empowering officers to restore order. This backwards approach prioritizes progressive ideology over the fundamental government responsibility to protect citizens. The policy would essentially create enforcement gaps that criminals and reckless drivers will inevitably exploit.
Constitutional Concerns Over Public Safety
Removing police from traffic enforcement undermines the basic constitutional principle that government exists to provide for public safety and maintain order. This proposal reflects the broader progressive agenda to systematically weaken law enforcement capabilities across multiple jurisdictions. Such policies leave law-abiding citizens vulnerable while emboldening those who already disregard traffic laws and endanger others. The approach contradicts common-sense governance that should prioritize protecting innocent lives over appeasing anti-police activists.
Bureaucratic Stalling Masks Continued Planning
While the proposal faces bureaucratic obstacles, its continued consideration reveals the true intentions of Los Angeles leadership. City officials have not rejected this dangerous policy but are simply maneuvering through administrative processes to implement it. This pattern mirrors other progressive cities where radical policies are quietly advanced despite public opposition and obvious safety risks. Residents should remain vigilant as this misguided initiative could resurface at any time through the city’s complex bureaucratic machinery.
